Oh My, Paul Krugman

flattr this!

Q: What do John May­nard Keynes and Steve Keen have in common?

A: They’ve both been mis­read by Paul Krug­man.

In just a cou­ple of days I’ve gone from the priv­i­lege of being acknowl­edged by Krug­man to being mis­read by him, in a way that would have any stu­dent failed in a mul­ti­ple choice exam. In a pas­sage where I specif­i­cally referred to DSGE models–which includes both “New Clas­si­cals” and “New Key­ne­sians” he inter­preted me as refer­ring to New Key­ne­sian mod­els only.

And I said “under­ly­ing prin­ci­ples to the DSGE mod­els”, which should have been enough of a clue that I was refer­ring specif­i­cally to New Clas­si­cal mod­els, not New Key­ne­sian ones.

The dis­parag­ing ref­er­ences to New Key­ne­sian mod­els came later, when I described them as being like Ptole­maic astronomers adding epicy­cles to an under­ly­ing model that couldn’t explain the ret­ro­grade motion of the planets.

Sigh.

Then hav­ing mis­read me, he con­cludes with “Nick uses a four-letter word to describe this; I can’t, because this is the Times”

Since I don’t work for The Times, I can and will use a four let­ter word to describe your poor com­pre­hen­sion here Paul:

Fail.

About Steve Keen

I am a professional economist and a long time critic of conventional economic thought. As well as attacking mainstream thought in Debunking Economics, I am also developing an alternative dynamic approach to economic modelling. The key issue I am tackling here is the prospect for a debt-deflation on the back of the enormous debts accumulated in Australia, and our very low rate of inflation.
Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Oh My, Paul Krugman

  1. Leadbelly says:

    Philip Pilk­ing­ton chimes in.
    Nobel Lau­re­ate Paul Krug­man selec­tively quotes rival to stitch him up after los­ing argument.

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/philip-pilkington-nobel-laureate-paul-krugman-selectively-quotes-rival-to-stitch-him-up-after-losing-argument.html

  2. barrythompson says:

    Nick Rowe admits his mistake:

    Nick Rowe on April 3, 2012 at 4:49 am said:

    Just for the record: I did not email Paul Krug­man. That’s not what “Nick Rowe sends me to…” means. Any “com­mu­ni­ca­tion” between me and Paul Krug­man is right there on the blogs.

    Yep, I learned later that Steve Keen had partly qual­i­fied what he had writ­ten a few para­graphs fur­ther down. I should prob­a­bly have kept read­ing rather than get­ting mad at that point, stopped read­ing, and fir­ing off my comment.

    http://rppe.org/hubris-leads-to-incompetence-the-rowe-krugman-edition/

  3. barrythompson says:

    Krug­man apol­o­gises too.

    Update update: Ah, so Keen didn’t mean DSGE — a term that refers only to New Key­ne­sian mod­els — when he said DSGE; he meant New Clas­si­cal, which he some­how regards as the under­ly­ing prin­ci­ples for mod­els that aren’t New Clas­si­cal at all. OK. Any­way, enough of that. I’m all for lis­ten­ing to heretics when they offer insights I can use, but I’m not find­ing that at all in this con­ver­sa­tion, just word games and con­tin­ual insis­tence that the mem­bers of the sect have insights denied to us lesser mor­tals. Time to move on.

  4. Steve Keen says:

    Where did he write that Barry?

  5. barrythompson says:

    On his ‘Oh My’ blog post.

  6. Pingback: interfluidity » Because the stakes are so small?

  7. Pingback: Krugman | Pearltrees

Leave a Reply