Total, total bullshit”?

Flattr this!

Oh dear. When Nas­sim Khadim from The Age asked me to com­ment yes­ter­dy on the elec­toral asser­tion being made by the Lib­er­al Party–that ris­ing State debt was putting upward pres­sure on inter­est rates–I respond­ed that the asser­tion was:

Total, total bull­shit. It’s like say­ing that some­body dropped a peb­ble into the ocean and that caused a tsuna­mi. And you can quote me on that.”

Well, I expect­ed just to see the “peb­ble and tsuna­mi” anal­o­gy turn up in the report. Instead, I saw the first two sen­tences of the above–and learnt the hard way that edi­to­r­i­al stan­dards at Aus­trali­a’s major dailies are no longer as reserved as I took for grant­ed:

Debtwatch No. 10: America’s Ponzi Schemes Unravel

Flattr this!

Named in mock hon­our of Amer­i­ca’s great­est swindler, a Ponzi Scheme is a finan­cial ruse that, for a time,  gen­er­ates appar­ent­ly great returns from an invest­ment that in fact pro­duces noth­ing. Ponzi Schemes ini­tial­ly appear to work because the pro­mot­ers pay ear­ly entrants seem­ing­ly fan­tas­tic returns, by the sim­ple expe­di­ent of giv­ing them mon­ey deposit­ed by lat­er entrants. So long as the Scheme con­tin­ues to grow, it can appear successful–and indeed indi­vid­u­als who get in and out before the Scheme col­laps­es can become fab­u­lous­ly wealthy.

The BIS Annual Report: From Goldilocks to the Three Bears

Flattr this!

Pri­or to the NASDAQ crash in ear­ly 2000, Amer­i­can com­men­ta­tors were fond of describ­ing their econ­o­my as being in a “Goldilocks” phase–with all eco­nom­ic indi­ca­tors being “just right”.

That phrase dropped out of cir­cu­la­tion after April 2000, but a lev­el of com­pla­cen­cy still ruled when that stock mar­ket crash appeared to have lit­tle impact on the real econ­o­my.

Com­pla­cen­cy dra­mat­i­cal­ly left the build­ing today, with the release of the Bank of Inter­na­tion­al Set­tle­men­t’s (BIS) 77th Annu­al Report. The BIS turns the Goldilocks sto­ry around, and sees it not from Goldilocks’ per­spec­tive, but from that of the Bears. Just as the Bears’ domes­tic idyll was dis­turbed by Goldilocks the Home Invad­er, the appar­ent­ly neat glob­al finan­cial sys­tem has been put at risk by out of con­trol spec­u­la­tive lend­ing.

Debtwatch gets a mention in Parliament

Flattr this!

It’s not yet the main top­ic of debate between Lib­er­al and Labor, but some of the argu­ments in Debt­watch have at least made their way into Hansard cour­tesy of a speech by Lau­rie Fer­gu­son. The full extract from the speech is shown below.

This makes a mock­ery of the claim by the Prime Min­is­ter that we have nev­er been bet­ter off. Whilst the Howard gov­ern­ment crows about the suc­cess in the econ­o­my, which was large­ly inher­it­ed from Labor and fuelled by the raw mate­ri­als demands of India and Chi­na, there is an alter­na­tive real­i­ty of an out-of-con­trol per­son­al debt spi­ral. Steve Keen from the Uni­ver­si­ty of West­ern Syd­ney writes:

First home payments hit $3000 per month

Flattr this!

Jes­si­ca Irvine from the SMH has writ­ten an excel­lent piece with this head­line in today’s SMH. I’ve linked it on the blog roll, but it’s linked here too for quick ref­er­ence.

 My Debt­watch report will be very brief this com­ing month: I’m off to the USA tomor­row for some con­fer­ences, and I’m “under the gun” to pro­duce papers and pre­sen­ta­tions to suit. I also won’t be avail­able for com­ment at the time of the RBA’s next meeting–which is of course high­ly unlike­ly to move rates in either direc­tion.

PM on New Zealand Reserve Bank Policy Shift–transcript

Flattr this!

Will Bud­get tax cuts fuel inflation?  (click here for the MP3 file)
PM — Wednes­day, 9 May , 2007  18:14:52
Reporter: Stephen Long
MARK COLVIN: Now, will the tax cuts in the Bud­get cause infla­tion?

Some lead­ing econ­o­mists argue that the Reserve Bank could be forced to lift inter­est rates down the track because Gov­ern­ment spend­ing and tax cuts will increase con­sump­tion and prices.

But oth­ers dis­agree. They argue that debt lev­els are so high that many peo­ple will be hand­ing their tax cuts straight to the bank.

ABC PM tonight–major policy shift by New Zealand RB?

Flattr this!

Stephen Long from ABC News brought to my atten­tion the fact that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand appears to be con­tem­plat­ing a return to reg­u­lat­ing lend­ing.

This is only hint­ed at at present, but it rep­re­sents a major shift in Cen­tral Bank thinking–and a wel­come one, from a debt-defla­tion­ary point of view.

I’m inter­viewed about it on PM tonight; in the mean­time, here are some rel­e­vant excerpts from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand: Finan­cial Sta­bil­i­ty Report, May 2:

Debtwatch May 2007: Booming on Borrowed Money

Flattr this!

It goes with­out say­ing that I’m a Cas­san­dra amongst the Pollyan­nas crow­ing about Aus­trali­a’s cur­rent eco­nom­ic per­for­mance data. Low infla­tion, low unem­ploy­ment, and no sign of a wages break­out, are the usu­al­ly-quot­ed sweet eco­nom­ic indi­ca­tors (admit­ted­ly with some strange bed­fel­lows, includ­ing a rel­a­tive­ly slow rate of eco­nom­ic growth for these con­di­tions, and a huge bal­ance of trade deficit despite the best terms of trade in his­to­ry).

So how do I jus­ti­fy the stance of a Cas­san­dra? Because things can’t con­tin­ue as nor­mal, when nor­mal involves an unsus­tain­able trend in debt. At some point, there has to be a break–though tim­ing when that break will occur is next to impos­si­ble, espe­cial­ly so when it depends in part on indi­vid­ual deci­sions to bor­row.

Debtwatch April 2007: Who’s having a housing crisis then?

Flattr this!

Who’s having a housing crisis then?

Glob­al eco­nom­ic atten­tion has been focused on the sub-prime lend­ing cri­sis in the Unit­ed States recent­ly, and many local ana­lysts have made sooth­ing nois­es to reas­sure Aus­tralians that “it could­n’t hap­pen here”.

The USA’s sub-prime mar­ket is indeed a pecu­liar­ly Amer­i­can phe­nom­e­non; but the lev­el of Aus­tralian house­hold debt (the sum of mort­gage debt and per­son­al debt) is every bit as extreme as the USA’s. And con­trary to pop­u­lar opin­ion, our debt binge dwarfs Amer­i­ca’s. As the chart below shows, Aus­trali­a’s house­hold debt to GDP ratio has been grow­ing more than three times as rapid­ly as the USA’s since 1990. The ratio has grown at an aver­age of just over 2% per annum in the USA; it has grown at over 6.8% per annum here.

Debtwatch goes blog

Flattr this!

A sub­scriber to my Debt­watch newslet­ter sug­gest­ed that I estab­lish a blog. I plan to pub­lish my month­ly Debt­watch report here, as well as send­ing it out to sub­scribers.

Next month I will also start a USA ver­sion of Debt­watch. The recent pan­ic on Wall Street can be seen as yet anoth­er “cor­rec­tion”, but it might also be the begin­ning of the unwind­ing of Amer­i­ca’s long-run­ning hous­ing bub­ble, which has dri­ven pri­vate debt lev­els there to over 160 per cent of GDP–higher even than Aus­trali­a’s. While we def­i­nite­ly have enough debt “home brew” of our own to trig­ger a cri­sis, we are as always just min­nows next to the USA; the old say­ing that “if the USA sneezes, Aus­tralia catch­es a cold” may come home very pow­er­ful­ly soon if the world’s largest econ­o­my actu­al­ly comes down with the pneu­mo­nia of a debt defla­tion.