Actually they’ve done no such thing. But they do effectively assume that it’s unnecessary all the time.
This transcendental truth became apparent to me in the reactions I have had from mainstream economists to a lecture I gave to my Kingston students this month (which is posted on my YouTube channel and blog).
This lecture introduce the Austrian school of thought, which is closely related to the Neoclassical mainstream–in that it shares its utilitarian theory of value, accepts basic supply and demand analysis, and sees capitalism as generally tending towards equilibrium. But it is also highly critical of the mainstream for the absurd assumptions about individual knowledge that it is willing to make to preserve its equilibrium-oriented mathematical approach. It sees capitalism’s strengths as how it encourages innovation, which is an equilibrium-disturbing process, and regards money as being both integral to capitalism and the primary source of economic cycles.
This talk covers all “the usual suspects” for me–the Neoclassical obsession with equilibrium, financial instability, the Loanable Funds myth and the reality of Endogenous Money, and the foolishness of governments trying to run a surplus as if they are households, when the better analogy is that they are banks and should run deficits to create part of the money supply the non-bank private sector needs.
Becoming an Economist is the introductory course on economics for undergraduates at Kingston University. This is the second of 11 lectures in the subject; I’ll post the others as I write them over the next few months. This lecture discusses why the Mainstream approach, starting from the fundamental question Walras posed “Can a system of free markets reach a set of prices that ensures that supply equals demand in all markets?”
The answer was “No”, but that didn’t stop the “Equilibrium Fetish Juggernaut” that Walras unleashed.
The Private Debt Project (this website will become active as of December 2015) invites proposals for articles, papers, and research notes related to the study of private debt and its relationship to economic growth and financial stability. The Project will provide honorarium for all published work. In cases involving papers with original research, it will also consider small research grants to help cover the cost of the research.
Commissioned articles, papers, and research notes will be published on The Private Debt Project’s on-line journal and will be disseminated to a wide audience of academics, policy experts, government officials, investors, and business leaders.
The Friends Provident Foundation has just established a Fellowship for UK journalism to produce a “a significant work of long form journalism in any medium on the theme of building resilient economies.”
I’ve copied the full press release below. For further details, click on this link. The full press release is copied below.
Journalist Fellowship 2016
The Foundation’s trustees have created a journalist fellowship to build a better understanding of economics in the wider public by working with a leading journalist to create a significant work of long form journalism in any medium on the theme of building resilient economies.
Becoming an Economist is the introductory course on economics for undergraduates at Kingston University. This is the first of 11 lectures in the subject; I’ll post the others as I write them over the next few months. This lecture discusses why economists disagree with each other, and draws analogies with astronomy at the time when Galileo discovered craters on the Moon, and moons orbiting Jupiter and Saturn.
This is the Powerpoint file for the lecture, which includes links to the Youtube videos used in this lecture:
One of the people I miss talking with in Australia is radio journalist and tech and internet expert Phil Dobbie. Fortunately there’s Skype, and we regularly now chat matters economic on his internet radio show Balls Radio. Here’s the latest complete program, including our discussion of why interest rates are so low and are not going to move up until the level of private debt falls dramatically–which is unlikely to happen.
One of the very enjoyable aspects of being in London is speaking regularly with Simon Rose on the business-oriented internet radio Share Radio. I know I can talk under wet cement; I think Simon could manage to talk after it had set solid. We have a great time bantering about topics economics, and I hope it’s of interest to the audience as well. Here’s the latest installment, with some earlier ones available here.
This blog has been verified by Rise: cD2ilYTuGGXNqqrhAyfUXzU3Aja9ymbF
For seven years now, the rate The Fed sets to determine the price banks pay to borrow from it and from each other has been zero, or so close to zero that the difference is immaterial. This is, historically speaking, not normal, and The Fed has a desperate desire to return to what is normal, which is rate a few per cent above the rate of inflation (see Figure 1).
This site does not give personal financial advice. The focus of this blog is economic analysis, and how you interpret this with respect to your own financial decisions is entirely up to you.
Steve Keen, Debtwatch, and any employees or associates will not be held liable for any losses resulting from decisions taken by any individual or entity as a consequence of reading materials on this blog.
Membership or sponsorship of this blog does not constitute purchasing any product service apart from those listed in the membership and sponsorship conditions.