International appeal for the protection of academic independence

Mar04
by Steve Keen on March 4, 2013 at 10:42 am

flattr this!

A group of Swiss aca­d­e­mics have recently launched a peti­tion to call for the pro­tec­tion of aca­d­e­mic inde­pen­dence. Per­son­ally I think it’s gone well past the point where pro­tec­tion is the appo­site term, given the extent to which the func­tion of Uni­ver­si­ties has been eroded over the last 4 decades. But we have to start some­where. Please read their peti­tion below and sign at the rel­e­vant web page for yourself:

(Eng­lish) http://zuercher-appell.ch/index_en.php

(Deutsch) http://zuercher-appell.ch/index.php

(Français) http://zuercher-appell.ch/index_fr.php

(Ital­iano) http://zuercher-appell.ch/index_it.php

Inter­na­tional Appeal for the pro­tec­tion of aca­d­e­mic independence

Now that coop­er­a­tion between the pri­vate sec­tor and pub­lic uni­ver­si­ties has all but become the norm, in Europe as else­where, it is time to ask some basic ques­tions: What is a uni­ver­sity? And what is its role in society?

Uni­ver­si­ties grew out of the idea of estab­lish­ing a place where free­dom of research, edu­ca­tion and schol­ar­ship is pro­tected and beyond venal influ­ence. They serve the com­mon good and in turn are sup­ported by the com­mu­nity. Directly linked to this found­ing idea is the aca­d­e­mic ethos that pre­serves the insti­tu­tion of the uni­ver­sity as a spe­cial place, free from polit­i­cal, ide­o­log­i­cal and com­mer­cial inter­ests. Free­dom of teach­ing and research is pro­tected by the Swiss Constitution.

Against this back­ground, it is self-evident that a pub­lic uni­ver­sity should nei­ther coop­er­ate with nor accept spon­sor­ship from insti­tu­tions asso­ci­ated with pub­lic scan­dal or uneth­i­cal con­duct. That is dam­ag­ing to the aca­d­e­mic rep­u­ta­tion of any uni­ver­sity. And it impinges upon the inde­pen­dence of the schol­ars con­cerned, par­tic­u­larly those directly funded by such insti­tu­tions, under­min­ing their sta­tus as guar­an­tors of inde­pen­dence and ethically-minded scholarship.

The Uni­ver­sity of Zurich was born of this same spirit of inde­pen­dent think­ing in 1833. It is “the first uni­ver­sity in Europe to be founded by a demo­c­ra­tic state instead of by either a monarch or the church”. This proud claim stands to this day on the university’s web­site. The ques­tion is: are today’s uni­ver­si­ties still suf­fi­ciently inde­pen­dent in an age of coop­er­a­tion and sponsorship?

In April 2012, the Exec­u­tive Board of the Uni­ver­sity of Zurich con­cluded a coop­er­a­tion agree­ment, in cam­era, with the top man­age­ment of UBS (Union Bank of Switzer­land). The agree­ment entails spon­sor­ing of the uni­ver­sity by UBS to the tune of 100 mil­lion Swiss francs and the estab­lish­ment of a “UBS Inter­na­tional Cen­tre of Eco­nom­ics in Soci­ety” within the scope of the uni­ver­sity. Nei­ther the pub­lic nor the research and teach­ing staff were asked their opin­ion. The agree­ment between the uni­ver­sity and UBS was con­cluded secretly in the spring of 2012.

This pro­ce­dure brings the issue of spon­sor­ship into sharp focus. The Exec­u­tive Board of the Uni­ver­sity con­cedes that the bank is using the uni­ver­sity as a plat­form to fur­ther its inter­ests. How­ever, UBS is a par­tic­u­lar case of a busi­ness that has been shown in the past to have engaged in uneth­i­cal prac­tices. The fact that the bank was able to place its logo at the Uni­ver­sity of Zurich has noth­ing to do with schol­ar­ship and every­thing to do with marketing.

It is a glar­ing exam­ple of the prob­lem­atic nature of aca­d­e­mic spon­sor­ship. But there are many more instances, in other Euro­pean coun­tries, of ques­tion­able uni­ver­sity spon­sor­ship deals. In one case, in June 2011, Deutsche Bank had to with­draw from a con­tro­ver­sial spon­sor­ship arrange­ment because of jus­ti­fied pub­lic crit­i­cism. This shows that spon­sor­ship involv­ing spe­cific vested inter­ests and secret deals – in con­trast to altru­is­tic patron­age and dona­tion by bene­fac­tors – rep­re­sents a threat to the impar­tial­ity of uni­ver­sity research and teach­ing. The very aca­d­e­mic ethos is at risk.

As cit­i­zens, researchers, aca­d­e­mics and stu­dents, we appeal to the lead­ers of the uni­ver­si­ties and all who bear respon­si­bil­ity for our edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions, at home and abroad, to safe­guard the pre­cious her­itage of free and inde­pen­dent schol­ar­ship, and to avoid endan­ger­ing the aca­d­e­mic ethos in con­tro­ver­sial collaborations.