As noted in the post above, this speech has a lengthy discussion with the audience at the end, which is well worth listening to.
Roving Cavaliers of Credit
Read Some Minsky
Monetary Profits Paradox
Are We "It" Yet?
Monetary Multisectoral Model
"No-one saw this coming"?
Why the Crisis is not over
Deleveraging with a twist
Bernanke doesn't understand the Great Depression
The Case Against Bernanke
Rescuing the Bubble
Australian house prices
Competition No Panacea
House Prices & Banks I
House Prices & Banks II
Lectures on Endogenous Money
Debt and Australian housing
BBC HARDtalk Interview
INET Interview on why I saw "It" coming
As noted in the post above, this speech has a lengthy discussion with the audience at the end, which is well worth listening to.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
![]() |
![]() |
This site does not give personal financial advice. The focus of this blog is economic analysis, and how you interpret this with respect to your own financial decisions is entirely up to you.
Steve Keen, Debtwatch, and any employees or associates will not be held liable for any losses resulting from decisions taken by any individual or entity as a consequence of reading materials on this blog.
Membership or sponsorship of this blog does not constitute purchasing any product service apart from those listed in the membership and sponsorship conditions.
©2007-2012 Steve Keen's Debtwatch | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑
Steve, you said you are working on adding government finances to your model. Will you model the deficit spending as if the Fed buys the bonds to finance the new debt?
Hi Kim,
I’ll try to model the actual process as closely as possible ultimately, but I may take some KISS steps on the way there.
Does it not make a significant difference? In other words, isn’t a stimulus effect different for a society already heavily indebted than one with low government debt?