When Herds Collide on the Yellow Brick Road
2010 is shaping up as the year that the bulls and bears of the world’s last unpopped asset market bubble—Australia’s property market—will collide head on. The gap between those predicting yet another bubble, and those predicting its ultimate demise, has closed.
The bulls as always, emphasise the “fundamentals”—population-fuelled demand outstripping laggardly supply—and that “Australia is different”.
The bears, as always, emphasise leverage— that the true fundamental behind asset prices is people’s willingness to go into debt to buy them, in the belief that they can flog them for a leveraged profit to the next Greater Fool. And on the “We’re different because we have kangaroos” theory, the bears contend that Aussies are just as susceptible to a well disguised Ponzi Scheme as anybody else on the planet.
I doubt that most people realise just how different Australia has to be to the rest of the world to sustain the bulls’ expectations of yet another explosion in house prices in 2010. Not only do we need to defy a worldwide trend of falling house prices, we need to sustain that on top of a house price bubble that has already exceeded the best the rest of the debt-driven world has achieved in the last 20 years.
Australian house prices rose by a factor of five since the 1987 Stock Market Crash, far more than even US house prices. Even adjusted for inflation, Australian house prices increased by over 250 percent from 1987 levels. The best the US’s housing bubble could manage, before it burst in 2006, was a meagre 180 percent rise.
One irony in the bull case is that it relies on the market not working properly—though the bulls push the “supply and demand” line, they also rely on supply failing to do what it allegedly does in normal markets, and responding to increased demand in a manner that tempers the demand-driven price spike.
They also are happy to receive state handouts when it keeps the bubble afloat. 2009 was clearly the year of the government-sponsored house price bubble, with the First Home Vendors Grant driving up sub-$500,000 prices by as much as $40,000. Those happy vendors then leveraged their bonus $40,000 from panicked First Home Buyers into an additional $200,000 or so on their next purchase—which inflated houses up to the $1 million mark.
On January 1 2010, that government boost completely disappears, while the “right wing” of our schizophrenic government economic management system, the RBA, has declared that it might attempt to prick the bubble caused by the boost its fiscal ”left wing” gave to house prices this year.
So with one artificial prop to the market removed, and the monetary wing of government threatening to prick what the fiscal wing re-inflated, we’re down to the final battleground: will Australians willingly increase their exposure to debt to finance yet another acceleration of house prices, and will banks and lenders accommodate them?
Lenders don’t have much room to add to leverage in the Land of Oz. We’ve long left the Kansas of the 1960s, when banks required a 30% deposit—so that someone with a $50,000 deposit could bid no more than $167,000 for their dream home. But having skipped down the Yellow Brick Road of rising leverage, the Global Financial Crisis has stopped the Wizards in their tracks. Without it, we may well have cracked through the 5% deposit—which turns a $50,000 deposit into a $1 million purchase price.
Now there are rumblings that, gasp, a 10% deposit might be required in future—and suddenly that $50,000 deposit will only finance a $500,000 dream home.
That could be a nightmare for vendors this year—and of course for the Wizards of Debt as well. I’ll almost certainly find myself (and some friends) trekking from Parliament House to Mount Kosciuszko in late February 2010, since the final gasp of the FHB is almost certain to drive the ABS’s established house price index above its pre-Boost peak of 131. But I expect that as I come down from the mountain, Australian house prices will also be losing altitude.


Discussion (117) ¬
Good article Steve. I wonder how much negative gearing has influenced the property bubble as opposed to the FHOG?
It’s possible that so much pressure may be applied to Rudd (or his successor) to continue the FHOG after January 2010. When the bubble does burst, it is likely that it will be blamed wholly on the FHOG and the government regulation – the sacred laws of supply and demand will receive a complete exoneration as markets always tend towards a harmonious equilibrium.
Hi Steve,
You will receive a lot of press coverage on your walk and so I would imagine you being bearish on real estate. Imagine if your bearish attitude was the final prick that bursts the bubble and as a result many people watching you on TV finally click about the absurdity of Australian real estate.
Imagine later newspaper headlines, “Steve Keen causes Housing bubble to pop!” It sounds stupid, but then our media is …
Anyway love your blog!
Peter, I’m sure Steve wouldn’t like to be known as “The prick who caused the housing bubble to pop”, and I think Glenn Steven might get that honour anyway!
Yeah I definitely agree with that! But you know how they love to shoot the messenger!
I think everyone knows how hard Steve has been working to try to inform/warn everyone that house prices are truly absurd.
And I greatly appreciate his time and effort.
“On January 1 2010, that government boost completely disappears”.
What’s the bet that the Government, seeing the potential political train wreck ahead, changes its mind and decides to provide further fiscal support one way or another to keep the wealth effect of the asset bubble alive in the mind of voters?
I mean they really pulled out the stops last time. Why not again?
does the starting point date of the two pricing graphs (100 being after the 1987 stockmarket crash) make much of a difference? i.e. making australia look better or worse than the US?
It would be very interesting to see Ireland (which seemed to increase faster than Australia, at least until 2003) and Japan (which peaked in 1990 and then dramatically declined) also superimposed on these graphs.
You can see them on these graphs 1986-2003 (sorry can’t find a more recent one) http://www.treasury.gov.au/documents/580/HTML/docshell.asp?URL=House_Prices.asp
Absolutely feasible Bruce,
But I have the feeling that, with the RBA quite explicitly saying it is trying to stop house prices rising–while also trying to guarantee that they don’t fall (if you read Richards’ recent speech), rather like the Hanna Barbera animator trying to keep Coyote in mid-air after he’s run off the edge of the cliff–the government will be incapable of pulling that stunt another time. The political carnage would be too much to endure.
Steve,
Are you an Elton John fan ? “Goodbye Yellow Brick Road” is my all time favorite song.
Ramanan
I think it has started, Some personal experience, Did a test run at the bank last week, we we went in looking for pre-approval to purchase a $600K house in a medium suburb in Melbourne, the bank manager was pushing for 20% deposit! babling something that we would have to pay mortgage insurance if we did a 10% deposit, so all up including Stamp duty we were up for $155k cash upfront on a $600k house. The Bank Manager was very strong in their recomendation of a 20% deposit, that they would not eve look at 10% deposit workings!! We justwalked out of there stunned, do they know something we dont!
Hi steve welcome back. Hope you had a good trip.
Must be 10:1 in favour of the oz bubble bursting, in conjunction with a general market correction round the world. No doubt a lot of new traffic will be generated here as a result.
robfarago,
the economist website has a great tool that enables you to compare prices across a number of different economies and depending on the country you can compare back to the mid 70′s.
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14438245
The koyote just needs to be suspended mid-air until the (early) elections.
Increase in prices by up to $40K in the sub $500K market? Steve, I’m seeing up to $100K. Many pundits are predicting flatline growth going forward. The level of emotion involved in the market would preclude that.
It’s interesting to see the changes in the rental vacancy rates over the last 12 months (they’ve doubled according to the REIV’s data). A proportion of the 150,000 or so recipients would have vacated rental accommodation and I suspect another tranche will follow as those who chose to build will take delivery of their new home. Yields will suffer.
Do you have a view on the impact of interest rate rises on GDP going forward?
Nothing surprising in this report, but worth a look.
http://www.demographia.com/dhi-ix2005q3.pdf
Dear Prof. Keen,
Very interesting article, indeed. Like I said in another message, I am no economist and your technical writings are way over my pay grade. But I can read and access the net, and what you say not only makes sense: it is there for everyone to see.
A few years back, an American fellow by the name of Joe Bageant wrote a book called “Deer Hunting with Jesus: Dispatches from America’s Class War”. It was published in 2007 in the US, a few months before the “thing” hit the fan. And he knew the bubble was going to burst.
I am no Joe Bageant (he writes much better than me), but I agree with you: the “thing” will hit the fan here, too. Maybe not next week, maybe not next month, but we’re getting there. Let’s wait until the RBA rises interest rates. We’re becoming too similar to the US.
Cheers,
Marco
PS: If the hike was somewhere closer, I would not mind joining you.
AK
Message #12
Spot on.
I like Graham Richardson’s (ex-ALP politician)phrase that you do “whatever it takes” to stay in power.
And if that means further additional stimulus for the economy to allow the government to be voted back in, then so be it.
The main question now is when the election will occur. Once the election is out of the way, then “Keensian” economics(i.e Steve’s predictions) will come to fruition.
Early election talk:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/asiapac/stories/200909/s2685685.htm
Is there any chance that with the rise of the Aussie dollar as a carry trade destination that the economy will be awash with money again soon?
Is it possible that with all that incoming money that the banks might get bullish again and start giving money to anyone with a pulse? In that case I could see more asset bubble action? They would have to hold everything together for a bit longer and get confidence up. In this scenario it would rely on the banks to control themselves, and I can’t see that happening. Then the RBA would crank rates which could make us an even bigger carry trade destination.
Of course, it would all end with Sydney being spelled Reykjavik in a couple of years time. Thoughts?
My solicitor warned me last week that if the banks will not finance me for the purchase of a farm then don’t bother calling him for a loan. This is the first time he has said this in 10 years. 12 months ago his clients were paying out their loans and going to the banks for cheap interest. But now he has so many people come to him for money (because the banks will not take the high leverage) that he cannot get money in the door as quick as he is lending out.
people out there like crazy, the properties in one of north shore suburbs are snatch up as if there are free, they are gone in a week if you are not hurry… you don’t even have the chance to have a second inspection! I am very frustrated…
i hope i’m not being too presumtuoes and this probably goes without saying, but since we’ve changed tack slightly with steves latest post on housing, i hope the chartilists and their brothers in arms who have made such elegant contributions of late do keep in touch.
on the subject of housing bubbles, the following link to data from various sources, to help us make up our own minds
http://www.ahuri.edu.au/housing_information/free_housing_data/
mahaish,
The new post on Bill’s blog is very much in the money regarding housing and assets bubbles:
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=5240
The main idea is I believe that fiscal rather that monetary policy is the right tool to moderate the market’s behaviour.
Are you looking for some others to walk with you. I’d be up for it. I’d get to choose my own t-shirt. Something like “government sponsored ponzi scheme” would be cool. How far is it again? I’m not that fit!
The last two weeks here in the WA oil & gas game have been all about the impending pick up in work. Retention schemes are re-surfacing, unsolicited job offers coming in.
Is the dream about to come crashing down? Will those with solar panels and chook farms be the only survivors?
Or will the truth lie somewhere in the middle…I’m sure mathcad can do a SVD solution!
Good for you and good luck on the walk.
Here in the States, the massive denail of reality continues. The business MSM keeps putting out the “we’re in recovery” message now. Oh really? The Dow was down roughly 200 points yesterday. There’s STILL no set value on “toxic assets.” The reason: the banks don’t want to be forced to take the loss. And, they don’t want to lose on yet another Ponzi scheme of repackaging rubbish.
First it was subprime loans. Then repacking commodities. And NOW it’s repackaging life insurance policies. Does anybody say, hang on a minute! This (fill in the blank) has to stop! Of course not. Obama re-appointed Bernanke. Geithner is just as bad as Greenspan in his denial of reality. And still NOBODY will replace them.
But at least it’s Friday.
“But at least it’s Friday.”
Just wait till the option adjustable rate and Alt-A mortgages start to reset on mass in 2010 through to mid-2012 in the US. A second wave of foreclosures and stressed selling will occur.
Interestingly enough, the greatest cause of bankruptcy in the US isn’t increasing negative equity due to the housing deflation but due to medical costs. So much for private medical insurance.