More gems and brickbats from the world’s media and blogs gathered by Evan, with contributions from other blog members. Please keep those tips coming in to gfcwrap at gmail.com.
AUSTRALIAN-RELATED LINKS:
June 9, 2009: A beautiful set of numbers tell only part of the economic story, Tim Colebatch, The Age.
The best analysis of the GDP data published in the Australian media:
“How can anyone make sense of this? In the March quarter, the constant price GDP figure was $271 billion on the production data, but $277.5 billion on the expenditure figures. Current price GDP was $299 billion on the income data but $305 billion according to the expenditure data.
This means there will be some heavy revisions ahead, as new data comes in, old data is re-checked, and the bureau thumps the numbers to make them fit. My guess is that those revisions will ultimately decide that the economy was either flat or went backwards in the March quarter.”
http://www.businessday.com.au/recovery
An in-depth and unbiased look at the top stories used to convince people to re-invest in bubble assets. Just don’t mention the debt.
CommBank Lifts Rates In Surprise Move, SMH, 12 Jun
Surprise move for whom? First home buyers? “The CBA’s move marks the first increase in floating mortgage rates since the last cut in official cash rates by the Reserve Bank and reverses the reduction passed on by the Commonwealth at that time. That will see the rate of its main home loan product rise by 10 basis points from 5.64 per cent to 5.74 per cent.” The rest of the cartel is set to follow suit immediately.
First-home Buyers Reach Their Peak In March, SMH, 9 Jun
“The Australian Finance Group said loans to first-home buyers rose to 28.1 per cent of all mortgage purchases in March, on a total number of 8988 loans. Since then, the share of first home buyers has fallen to 27.7 per cent in April, on 8109 loans, and 24.8 per cent in May on 7236 loans.” The SMH contradicted this story the very next day citing ABS stats to claim that “The proportion of first-home buyers taking out loans rose to 28 per cent in April, the highest share to first-home owners since the data series began in 1991” in their breathlessly positive story captioned “First-home Buyers Rush In”? (Hat-tip “furbana” for pointing out problems with the previous commentary).
Housing Fear As Loans Hit New High, SMH, 11 Jun
No, in any Ponzi scheme the real panic begins when the loans STOP hitting new highs. “The average first-home loan in NSW has risen more than $50,000 in just over a year, climbing to $300,000 on the back of low interest rates and generous government grants.”
Ken Henry Dives For Ideas In The Super Pool, The Australian, 12 Jun
“Federal Treasury boss Ken Henry has established a departmental review to examine ways in which the superannuation savings pool can be directed to seed new markets and target specific areas, such as corporate debt and infrastructure.” Another looting exercise that will probably go unnoticed.
Business Confidence Surges, SMH, 9 Jun
The Greater Fool factory is back in production and taking orders. “Business confidence surged in May, posting its biggest monthly gain in eight years on the global sharemarket rally and an infrastructure spending boost… The index is now at the highest level since February of 2008, well before the acceleration of the global financial crisis.”
Jilted China Says Rio ‘Dishonourable’, John Garnaut, SMH, 9 Jun
Creditor nations should mind their manners or face the consequences. “Rio Tinto has behaved like ‘a dishonourable woman’ in spurning China’s white knight, Chinalco, according to the country’s official news agency, Xinhua, in the latest response to the failure of the pair’s $US19 billion ($24 billion) tie-up.”
[Which?] Bank ‘Linked’ System To Storm, SMH, 10 Jun
“The Commonwealth Bank devised a computer system that encouraged clients of Storm Financial to increase their borrowing, making them more vulnerable to a sharemarket plunge, according to a former senior manager of the collapsed financial planner.”
Few Of Us Living Beyond Our Means, The Autralian, 10 Jun
“Australians have been well-served by their willingness to take on private debt over the past 40 years and relatively few households were carrying more than they could handle before the global financial downturn.” We beg to differ. If you can find any data that underpin the claims in this article then please let us know. Otherwise, check out Steve Keen’s “Deeper In Debt” and make up your own mind. Contributed by blog member Steve.
GLOBAL ECONOMY / BANKING / FINANCE:
Bernanke Conundrum Threatens Housing on Mortgage Rate, Bloomberg, 8 Jun
The story of the week. Despite unprecedented money printing by the US Fed, rising US treasury yields over the last month are pushing up retail mortgage rates. This reduces the size of loans available to prospective property buyers and therefore threatens to kill off the so-called improvements in the US housing market. “The more rates go up, the more we need home prices to go down to equalize consumers’ payments.” Another article, Bond-market rout lifts mortgage cost, explains the dynamic further including the impact of big spending plans. “That’s the Catch-22 threatening to make an awful housing market potentially worse and keep the economy stuck in a funk. Kick-starting the economy requires higher spending, but rising rates mean fewer Americans will be able to refinance their home loans. And some potential buyers will be shut out of the market by higher monthly payments they won’t be able to afford.”
The Still Over-leveraged Consumer, The Big Picture, 9 Jun
“Despite spending less time at the mall, throttling back consumption, and increasing their savings rate, the US consumer still finds themselves with too much debt and too little savings. Even worse (at least for the economy), they lack the income or the equity to fund their previous lifestyles.”
Inland Southern California: Prices At 20 Year Low, Calculated Risk, 10 Jun
Wow. Just one example: “John A. Beatrice, 55, bought his spacious two-story Spanish-style house there brand-new for $120,000 in 1989. It was a price he could comfortably afford, and he planned on staying through retirement, so he wasn’t worried about price swings… But he never imagined his neighborhood would drop off the charts. In April, a slightly larger home two doors away sold for $66,500. That’s just over half the $130,000 it went for new in 1992. In 2005, that house sold for $330,000.” Calculated Risk also reports that foreclosure activity may hit 1.8 million by mid-year and commercial mortgage defaults seen rising to a 17-year high.
The Fed: Bankrupt, Denninger, 10 Jun
Interesting 12 minute interview with Jim Grant, a bond trader and editor of a business journal. He discloses his views on the US Fed and the possible results of zero rate interest policies.
Latvia’s Currency Crisis Is A Rerun Of Argentina’s, Noriel Roubini, FT, 10 Jun
“Of course, as in Argentina, letting the currency depreciate would lead to massive negative balance-sheet effects. The large foreign liabilities of households, companies and banks are in foreign currency; the real value in local currency of such debts would increase sharply after a devaluation.”… as intended.
Chinese imports in May dropped 25% and exports 26%, MercoPress, 12 Jun
“Chinese exports dropped by a record amount in May as demand for its goods from the US and Europe slumped. Exports fell 26.4% from the same month earlier, more than February’s previous record drop and imports declined by 25.2%.” Note how the FT spun these depression-like drops: Positive signs in China despite trade fall. In a separate attack on those green shoots, China’s electric consumption does not support official growth statistics: “China’s power consumption in May continued to decline… Zhao Bingren, ex-chairman of China Electricity Regulatory Commission, expressed his doubt on economic statistics reported by some areas.” (Contributed by Macca.)
Counter-cyclical or Counter-productive?, Doug Noland, 5 Jun
[Scroll to the bottom section.] “We’re witnessing the same analytical errors today that were made in the post-tech Bubble analysis: the willingness to inflate an even greater Bubble for the cause of mitigating the pain from the so-called deflationary risks associated with a bursting of THE Bubble. And with each reflation comes a heightened governmental role in both the markets and real economy – to the point where Washington is essentially backstopping the financial and economic systems.”
The Great Unwinding, David Brooks, NYT, 11 Jun
“For about a generation, the U.S. surfed on a growing wave of debt… Charts that mark these trends are truly horrifying. There is a steady level of debt through most of the 20th century, until the mid-1980s. Then there is a steep accelerating rise to today’s epic levels.” Contributed by ak.
German Exports Fall 29% In April, BBC, 9 Jun
News not widely reported in the anglo financial press.
IMF Tells Europe To Come Clean On Bank Losses, Telegraph [UK], 8 Jun
More hypocritical contradictions. The US runs scam stress tests and presents the predetermined and fraudulent results as a cause for optimism, helping to spark a stock market rally. The US, who basically run the IMF, then tells Europe by proxy to come clean on their bank losses. The next day the WSJ reports that Tim Geithner backed up the team by asking Europe to “put their banks through more rigorous public stress tests to help ensure that the institutions survive if the economy slips from bad to worse”.
TARP Panel Chair Suggest Running Stress Tests Again, CNBC, 9 Jun
Elizabeth Warren, told CNBC Tuesday: “We actually make recommendations to do it all over again right now… We’ve already blown past the worst-case scenario on unemployment”. Denninger chips in.
Alabama County Set to Halt Services, Shut Buildings Over Budget, Bloomberg, 5 Jun
“Alabama’s most populous county is preparing to stop road maintenance, close courthouses and shutter services for the elderly after a court struck down taxes that pay for about 35 percent of its budget.” More of this to come.
Bank Profits From Accounting Rules Masking Looming Loan Losses, Bloomberg, 5 Jun
“The new accounting rules, the stress tests: They’re all part of a major effort to put lipstick on a pig.” “The accounting rule changes that matter most for the banks came on April 2, when the Financial Accounting Standards Board gave companies greater latitude in how they establish the fair value of assets.” “Along with that change, FASB also let companies recognize losses on the value of some debt securities on their balance sheets without counting the writedowns against earnings. If banks plan to hold the debt until maturity, they can avoid hurting the bottom line.”
[US] Payroll Data In Perspective, Zero Hedge, 5 Jun
Note that the US jobs story, as originally spun, was presented as good news in the Australian media. “It is difficult to rejoice over an employment data that is consistent with real GDP still declining anywhere from a 2% to 4% at an annual rate. Now here we are, close to nine months after the Lehman collapse, and we are still printing employment numbers that are double what they were before pre-Lehman. That is the bigger picture. “The internals of today’s report, in a word, were awful. if companies had held hours worked constant in May instead of cutting them, to achieve the total labour input they achieved last month would have required — get this — a 927,000 payroll cut.” Also see, temp work covers up depth of unemployment.
Fed Intends to Hire [ex-Enron] Lobbyist in Campaign to Buttress Its Image, Bloomberg, 5 Jun
You couldn’t make this up. “’People have been asking whether the Fed is capable of getting its job done right,’ said Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission. ‘Hiring a former lobbyist from Enron will surely make one wonder.’”
Senators Want Homebuyer Tax Credit to Rise to $15,000, Bloomberg, 10 Jun
“Lawmakers are pushing to revive legislation in the Senate that would almost double an $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers and expand the program to all borrowers.” America searches for a new class of sub-prime borrower and decides to follow Australia’s successful model.
Under The Surface, New York Has A Desperation I Have Not Seen Before, SMH, 13 Jun
Excellent, anecdote-filled article on doom and gloom in the Big Apple.
A Tale of Two Depressions, Voxeu.org, 4 Jun
Contributed by Greg. Detailed comparisons between the current GFC and the last big one. It’s hard to see how this could all be turning around so soon, isn’t it?
North Korea jails US journalists, BBC, 8 Jun
A blog reader notes that one of the jailed journalists, Laura Ling, had created the “Lost Vegas” video featured in the Pool Room two weeks ago. Strange. Maybe that’s what happens when journalists get out of line.
Place Your Wages, Financial Sense, 5 Jun
Excellent article analysing the impact of unemployment and falling wages on the US economy (and hence the global economy). Contributed by Macca.
Economists Saw Danger Signs, But Failed At Disclosure, The Age, 27 May
“Most of them failed to see the weaknesses in financial markets. But they were not only blind. They rejected the possibility of unparalleled disaster because it did not fit their model of rational and efficient markets, of financial innovation effectively transferring risk, of market prices reflecting the state of the world and self-regulation being more appropriate than heavy-handed government intervention.“
Poking Holes in a Theory on Markets, NYT, 5 Jun
Contributed by Michael. “In the last decade, the efficient market hypothesis, which had been near dogma since the early 1970s, has taken some serious body blows… These days, you would be hard-pressed to find anybody, even on the University of Chicago campus, who would claim that the market is perfectly efficient.”
Break The Banks, For The Good Of The People, Joseph Stiglitz, The Age, 10 Jun
“With all the talk of “green shoots” of economic recovery, America’s banks are resisting efforts to regulate them. While politicians talk about their commitment to regulatory reform to prevent a recurrence of the crisis, this is one area where the devil really is in the details – and the banks will muster what muscle they have left to ensure that they have ample room to continue as they have in the past.”
GEOPOLITICAL:
CCIC Beats Goldman As China Banks Join Top Ranks In Asia Bonds, Bloomberg, 11 Jun
The world stopped buying US manufactured goods decades ago. Now it doesn’t need US financial services.
US Securities Seized From Japanese Nationals, Asianews.it, 8 Jun
Fascinating. There’s lots of talk of naked shorting bonds… now the electronic counterfeiting may have turned physical. “Italy’s financial police has seized US bonds worth US 134.5 billion from two Japanese nationals… on the border between Italy and Switzerland. They include 249 US Federal Reserve bonds worth US$ 500 million each, plus ten Kennedy bonds and other US government securities worth a billion dollar each.” Denninger speculates that this could be a sovereign attempting to covertly dump $140 billion in debt.
Crowded Debt Sales Risks Causing ‘Auction Fatigue’, FT, 4 Jun
Excellent article. “But make no mistake: the potential for an accident is rising, as the auction calendar fills. Fingers crossed that the phrase “government bond auction fatigue” is not something that ever hits the headlines of the mainstream press this year. Even – or especially – in those dangerous summer months.”
Top Chinese Banker Calls For Wider Use of Yuan, UK Telegraph, 8 Jun
“Guo Shuqing, the chairman of state-controlled China Construction Bank (CCB), also said he is exploring the possibility of issuing loans to trading companies in yuan, allowing Chinese and foreign companies to settle their bills in yuan rather than in dollars.”
Treasuries Tumble After Auction, Russian Threat To Cut Holdings, Bloomberg, 10 Jun
“Russia’s central bank may switch some of its reserves from Treasuries to International Monetary Fund bonds, the bank’s first deputy chairman, Alexei Ulyukayev, said in Moscow today.” “While leaders of the nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China talk about substituting the dollar, the so-called BRIC countries have increased foreign reserves at the fastest pace since September.” In a separate article, Russia’s president warns against relying on the dollar.
30y Bond Results: Beware, Denninger, 11 Jun
“If you think hyperinflation is coming, or even serious inflation, you’re going to get your head cut off on a 4.6% 30y bond.” “There is only one reason for the FCBs to want this sort of exposure: they expect a ramp in the dollar and crushing DEFLATION, as this is the only way that bet will pay off.”
Ecuador Celebrates Sovereign “Defaulted” Bonds Repurchase, MercoPress, 12 Jun
“Ecuador announced Thursday it had bought back 91% of its ‘defaulted’ bonds via an international auction with drastic rebates of 65% to 70%… President Rafael Correa called the debt buyback a “resounding victory” and the start of a new era in international markets that he says are at fault for the global financial crisis hurting poor nations.” Hooray!
Brazil Considers G8 Is No Longer A Valid Political Decision Group, MercoPress, 12 Jun
It’s amazing what you find outside of the anglo MSM. “’G8 is over as a political decision group’ since ‘it represents nothing at all’ and ‘it’s not a valid instrument to address the reform of the global financial system’, said Brazil’s Foreign Affairs minister.”






June 13th, 2009 at 2:55 pm
I just want to check something… it would be useful to know if many readers were aware of those depression-like Chinese trade figures (down 25% in May).
I trawl through a lot of websites and it was only through luck that I found it (after visiting a very obscure US blog that linked to a South American news service). All the mainstream news out of China over the last few months has been desperately bullish.
I find this shocking as Chinese trade figures would have been front-page news in all the mainstream papers before the co-ordinated Green Shoots campaign began in early March.
Am I missing something?
June 13th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Umm… so why did the SMH claim the next day that “The proportion of first-home buyers taking out loans rose to 28 per cent in April, the highest share to first-home owners since the data series began in 1991” in their breathlessly positive story captioned “First-home Buyers Rush In”?
Because Steve, the abs reported that to be the case.
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/5609.0Apr%202009?OpenDocument
TABLE 9a.
June 13th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
fundana
Thanks for pointing this out. I’ll amend the commentary.
Any comments on China’s dramatic trade drop not being reported?
June 13th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Evan,
I can’t subscribe to this media conspiracy you allude to that presents everything as sunshine and lollpops. I think that it may appear that way because the media are basically a bunch of hacks who listen too much to an even bigger bunch of hacks called economists.
I can’t really believe anything that comes out of the Chinese government. I prefer to look at things like electricity consumption which has continued to decline in recent months.
June 13th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Hi guys,
Just back from India on a work related trip. Initially there were reports about multinational IT firms downsizing big time. This led to increase working hours from 8 to 9 hrs. However, when i was there a lot of projects rolled in and the downsizing trend has reversed and India is booming big time. They have a middle class population bigger than the size of the US and are big savers and are doing very well.
Even, if they take a hit because of the GFC they are well equipped to do well and sustain growth. The economy has opened up totally. The housing market is grossly overvalued and has fallen. However it is still far from affordable But no one seems to care much that House prices are actually comming down-UNLIKE HERE. In this sense Australia is a BACKWARD COUNTRY because we cannot seem to think out of the box and find ways to generate real wealth.
While I was away all I could read is the same nonsense about yet another journalist or economist, politician making the same case as to why we dont have a housing bubble.
I did a lot of shopping while in India and I found the material and the build quality to be far better than the Chinese counterparts. I really dont understand why we are forced to live with a one sided competition and not having choice? Doesn’t increased competition give rise to better value and better service? This might have something to do with India not having free trade arrangements with OZ and other countries.
The negatives was sicking traffic-the traffic makes you anxious and tired. Pollution and filth is beyond repair and overcrowding means there is no concept of space. If you are traveling expect people, cars, objects walking into you and the chart topper is corruption.
I really would love to tap into that market-A billion people no wonder OZ is desperate to sign the free trade deal with India.
June 13th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
I forgot to mention I was shocked with Indias Tenancy laws. The laws are made to protect tenants and if you do not rotate your tenant within 11 months, the tenant can go to court and claim the House. In almost all cases the tenant wins. Maybe this discourages speculation but not to many people are keen about renting out their premises unless it is a multinational corporation, bank, foreign students. They prefer to have it locked or a secure tight contract.
June 13th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
hi evan,
think the main reason for the lack of hoo ha over the trade figures, is that everyone in the know was expecting it.
the main game for china watchers at the moment is the domestic economy.
if that starts to head south like the trade figures, that will well and truely get the jungle drums going.
June 13th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
hi josh,
interested to hear that house prices are coming down in india.
a sri lankan friend of mine is saying the same thing about sri lanka.
house prices going down for the first time in living memory.
i’m curious, was there a housing bubble in india in recent times courtesy of the huge US dollar surpluses in the east asian banking systems.
atleast somethings dont appear to have changed.
driving in india and sri lanka is a bit like that car chase scene in the french connection.
they make italians look positively pedestrian.
i wish to god that they would hire somebody with a can of paint and put some lane markings down, so you dont end up playing a game of chicken with oncoming traffic
June 13th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Can someone tell me why The Economist say that we as a society has a big debt that is a burden?
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13829461&source=hptextfeature
OK I know that there is a big debt out there but to whom is it owed? Surely it is to other members of our world society. Isn’t the problem one of ownership rather than one of debt. If for example all the people to whom money was owed “forgave” the debt then wouldn’t all the assets still exist and other things being equal surely there should be no financial problem. Isn’t the problem one of equating money with debt rather than keeping the two separate.
June 13th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Is blatantly obvious that having the Chinese government as both the seller and the buyer of our resources is not in Australia’s best long-term interests. It is merely a matter of short-term gain for Australia (selling out to China) vs long-term gain (hanging on and making them buy the resources a bit at a time).
I very much doubt that the current Aus government would have the grit to sacrifice short term gain for the long term. Good thing that Rio managed to privately do the right thing for themselves and the rest of us. I agree that Rio and BHP together are moving to a monopoly position, which is generally not good for the market. On the other hand, China uses its monopoly position on metals such as Neodymium to good effect, so they can spare us the amateur theatrics and tacky tear-jerk routine.
June 13th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
There’s plenty of Indian metalwork for sale in Australia, jewelery, kitchen ware, utensils, that sort of stuff. Probably not as much Indian electronics but it’s getting there.
In all industries, Australia’s imports are not throttled by lack of free trade agreement but by the insanely complex procedures imposed by our Customs regulations. As a consequence, some products are easily available overseas but very tedious to buy here (to the point where people just give up even looking locally and just mail-order over the Internet and stomach the Fedex charges). Generally you have to buy Chinese electronic components via the USA websites because they provide decent service (go figure huh).
June 13th, 2009 at 9:48 pm
I don’t think there is any doubt that the PRC is being successful in it’s implementation of it’s economic stimulation. But for Australia that is not the issue. The issue for us is ; Are the stimulus measures by China enough to help Australia avoid a sustained recession/depression?
Besides the depression like trade data, there is also other negative data to reconcile;
- declining electricity consumption.
- many dozens (80?) large vessels (cape size) idling in wait off Chinese ports with full cargoes of commodities particularly iron ore. Supposedly ordered to take advantage of low shipping rates (which now look to have peaked- Baltic Dry well off it’s recent highs by 18% or so)
- Car registrations FAR below domestic car production. China car manufacturing measures factory production- not regisrations.
- There are reports of a glut in cement in China.Reports of overbuilding are rife.
The stimulus is provided through China’s SOE’s and local government bodies.Reports abound of the problematic implementations they are facing indicate many looming bankrupcies and bridges to nowhere.Internal investment figures are swelled by the sale of land by local authorities to SOE’s- facilitating a host of transactions designed to facilitate corruption more than development.
No doubt the Chinese stimulus is working and in action. But will it be *enough* to work it’s magic for Australia? That is unknown as yet.But we know where to look for the answers.
As for selling great chunks of our mineral companies to China- that is madness.Giving your customer a controlling interest in the productions process and access to all your sensitive cost data is in effect a form of financial suicide. And let’s not forget that this is not a “corperation” we are talking about. This is a state owned entity, in a state that is not democratically elected, insular, is oppressive and discrinatory.China is agggressively pursueing her interests and we should do no less.
Evan:
Yes, the news – all news – is being actively manipulated. It is being sickeningly spun and editted to achieve the results recently seen in consumer confidence around the globe.This was a coordinated outcome of first the G20 meetings and then Bilderberg. Anyone who doesnt understand that is naive and deluding themsleves. With world growth now negative as much as 5%, all the OECD economies that grow through rising consumer debt are in a panic. With consumption now in reverse (people saving)much energy and influence is being expended by Govts colluding with their partners in global mass media campaigns (green shoots etc) to reverse that now secular trend.It was the same in the GD.
June 13th, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Hi,
I forgot to mention that Indians prefer foreign goods (made in the western world and not asia exception is Cars. They are willing to pay the premium as there is a perception that there is a distinct quality difference. The property prices have fallen a lot by as much as 50KAU to 100KAU if you convert that might equate to a 10 to 20% fall. People are staying away from property as they believe it is way too overpriced and has a long way to fall.
June 14th, 2009 at 7:45 am
Hi fundana,
I tend to agree with you there–Evan and I debate this one regularly, and I tend to put the MSM failings down to much more prosaic (or even prozac!) issues than conspiracy.
June 14th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
‘More Australian banks to lift home rates’
http://www.news.com.au/business/money/story/0,28323,25631576-14327,00.html
Nick Gardner wrote: ‘Industry experts say the Commonwealth Bank’s surprise 0.1 per cent rise in its variable rate on Friday signals a shift in sentiment over the future of rates.’
My comment: What a great surprise. The Guardian wrote about that on Thursday.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/11/mortgages-rates-inflation-nationwide
From The Guardian: ‘Britain’s banks are raising mortgage costs after an increase in their own funding driven by government bond yields. As investors have become more optimistic about the health of the UK economy, they have begun to fret about the return of inflation. That has prompted them to sell government bonds, known as gilts, whose long-term value is eroded by high inflation. When the price of gilts falls, their yield – the interest rate the government must pay to borrow – goes up. Today the yield on 10-year gilts hit a seven-month high of 4.01%. Since many other interest rates across the economy are set with reference to gilt yields, this increase is feeding through to borrowing costs for ordinary families and businesses.’
My comment: I am not so sure whether UK economy is going to recover but the yield increase is an indisputable fact.
More from The Guardian:
‘Fears of inflation are rising, because:
• Oil prices have more than doubled, hitting an eight-month high of $72 a barrel yesterday;
• Manufacturing output in the UK increased in April, prompting predictions that the recession is coming to an end;
• There are fears the Bank of England’s £125bn quantitative easing policy could feed through into rising prices if consumer demand recovers rapidly.’
My comment: But this is obviously not relevant in Australia as we are not connected to global financial markets. Our banks do not need to borrow money overseas.
Nick Gardner wrote:
‘Economists say higher funding costs and a lack of competition have left the door open for banks to lift their rates at will.
“They might be starting to flex their muscles,” Morgan Stanley chief economist Gerard Minack said.
“The financial crisis has cleaned out the competition for the banks and this may be a hint that they’re beginning to exploit their market power.
“The non-banks have been decimated and the big players have swallowed up most of the competition, so they have the market to themselves.’
My comment: Oh yes so we can fix it. Easily.
More from Nick Gardner:
‘However, the banks may end up simply forcing the RBA’s hand.
“Ironically, if the banks raise their mortgage rates, it’ll just make another cash-rate cut by the Reserve Bank more likely,” Macquarie Bank interest-rate strategist Rory Robertson said. ‘
My comment: Or maybe it cannot be fixed so easily?
From Nick Gardner’s article:
‘Any rate hikes will be a kick in the teeth for those first-home buyers who are maxed out on their mortgage and already stretching to meet repayments.
“The Government’s First Home Owner Grant has lured thousands of people into the market who perhaps couldn’t really afford it,” University of Western Sydney economics professor Steve Keen said.
“With so much talk about falling interest rates, few gave much thought to the chance that they could rise any time soon.
“If all the banks follow and funding costs continue to rise, we could have a disaster.” ‘
My comment: This might be indeed the tipping point, the beginning of the next phase of the crisis in Australia. If the housing bubble is going to finally burst we are heading towards the same kind of meltdown as in the US or UK. The only thing apart from reducing interest rates (by pushing RBA to do that) the government can do is to intervene on the housing market directly. The cost of FHOG is about $500mln but it resulted in injecting about 5 bln into the housing market. That sum resulted in temporarily stabilising the trajectory of the system on the inflationary side.
http://business.theage.com.au/business/federal-budget/budget-winners-and-losers-20090512-b1ql.html?page=1
http://www.earthsharing.org.au/2009/05/13/swan-wimps-out-to-property-lobby/
If due to the increase in mortgage rates potential home buyers lose faith in the bubble any further intervention may require injecting billions of dollars directly into the market by for example cleaning up debris on the market from repossessions (by financing the housing commission on steroids). The total volume of trade on the housing real estate market in 2006/7 was $200bln
http://www.reiaustralia.com.au/institute/IndustryProfile.asp
This volume can of course decrease during the recession but nevertheless any direct intervention on the housing market must be calibrated in billions of dollars. I have no time to do any further research on this (it might be interesting to check the percentage of repossessed properties in the US as the bubble deflates and use these numbers to estimate the number of potential repossessions in Australia) but my gut feeling is that the government may be unable to defend the housing bubble for much longer.
June 14th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
ak
Your comment: “But this is obviously not relevant in Australia as we are not connected to global financial markets. Our banks do not need to borrow money overseas”.
Is not quite correct, they may not need to borrow to obtain AUD credit. They have been however needing to borrow to cover the current account deficit and foreign debt which has been increasing exponentially for the last 50 odd years. Our big connection to global financial markets $AU 700,000,000,000 approx. This needs to be rolled over and serviced allegedly by the banks.
That is unless the CAD responsibities and the roll over of foreign debt is being entirely taken over by the government. But by neo-classical theory such government debt is bad therefore even by these stupid peoples’ stupid theories things are going bad, very bad, right now and they are do not seem to be aware of even this.
This all causes lagging negative feedback which will eventually bring about the “tipping effect”. Foreign lenders will eventually loose faith in the governments ability to service the debt. We, as a country have been technically insolvent for at least 33 years.
June 14th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
peekaboo accounting and the 135b in treasury bills
long interview with max keiser on how the majority of money is now made on transaction fees on large transactions,endemic fraud, lack of global accounting means banksters just move assets around to prove solvency at various audits rather than a systemic audit being done, allowing insider trading for liquidity reasons has meant this has come to dominate the system and most businesses largest profit centres are from trading. scary but very good!
http://ia301536.us.archive.org/2/items/MaxKeiserRadio-TheTruthAboutMarkets-13June2009/tam130609.mp3
June 14th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
hi brightspark,
i’m not sure if the banks fund the current account or they are respnosible for creating it in the first place with the help of the government.
may be those more enlightened than me on these matters would care to contribute.
ever since the trade barriers towards importing money were removed by hawke and keating, the banks have seen fit to import a lot of it.
its no coincidence that bankers named both keating and costello treasurers of the year.
buy cheap money overseas and sell at a healthy profit locally. they sometimes have problems with timing , since they buy short term and lend long term.
cheap money, thanks to allen greenspan.
as for foreigners loosing faith, well i’m not sure how soon that will happen, given the current feedback loop thats happening.
in the global economic beauty contest, we are probably winning the sash at the moment,so foreigners are quite happy to give us money theyve parked on the sidelines.
the capital we are managing to import is allowing us to keep looking relatively good ,compared to the other contestants, which in turn encourages foreigners to give us more money, which allows us to keep looking good, and so on and so on.
if the reflationary attempts fail around the world, or we get scandels arising from the bailouts that are happening around the world, we could have a second round of market collapses, which could be much more severe than what we have witnessed, then our foreign sugar dadies may change their minds about giving anyone any money. they may go and park it all in US dollars and gold.
unfortunately the past isnt very encourging on this matter, since during the great depression capital flows from centre countries to the periphery(which is us) virtually dried up.
so by my reckoning if the current account deficit starts to shrink we are in whole heap of guano
June 15th, 2009 at 2:39 am
Would anyone like to comment on this article ?
Is there any validation for what this says or is it property spruikers trying to keep the ponzi scheme going ?
http://www.news.com.au/business/money/story/0,28323,25634840-5013951,00.html
Australian house prices to rise by up to 20 per cent
June 15th, 2009 at 9:38 am
Hey Spooky,
Sounds more like wishful thinking than anything substantial. They’re also expecting unemployment to top out at 7%, another unlikely scenario.
June 15th, 2009 at 11:18 am
Spooky, BIS Shrapnel’s reports have a very poor track record. They predicted strong jobs growth and property price rises over the last 12 months too.
June 15th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Can someone enlighten me as to the nature of the borrowing which CBA has seen a recent increased cost of, that resulted in their .1% interest rate hike? I am curious as to whom CBA are borrowing from, and for what purpose.
June 15th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
Ernie,
This may be interesting:
http://www.rba.gov.au/Speeches/2009/sp_ag_310309.html
This US T-bonds yields graph may provide some interesting context (it is not linked directly but rather indirectly):
http://www.kshitij.com/graphgallery/usdsin00.shtml#sin00
June 15th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
ak what is the significance of the 2nd chart in your post? If yields are rising what implications does it have for the Australian economy?
June 15th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
That it might be more expensive to raise capital overseas in the future – but this is as I said “might” and “indirectly related”. The graph illustrates market expectations about the inflation in the US. These expectations can be incorrect.
Somebody more knowledgeable should comment on this and I may be wrong.
June 16th, 2009 at 1:28 am
I found this interesting news roll blog: http://patrick.net
This is an image that says a lot about any premature recovery: http://patrick.net/housing/contrib/resets.png
June 16th, 2009 at 4:55 am
Here is another post from Paul Krugman explaining his attempts to model Minsky. If anyone is knowledgeable on both Steve’s models and the classes of models Paul Krugman references, the window of time to comment there is still open.
June 16th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Oh God,
I wouldn’t even bother. It looks like a “Period 0, 1, 2″ model with 3 classes of agents, all optimising in each time period according to their behavioural classes (rational, herd, irrational)… There ain’t no debt, there are no trade cycles…
I had to sit through a paper of this type at an econophysics conference open day in Jakarta a few years ago by a French neoclassical. He started explaining his model by saying it starts in Period 1, trade occurs in Period 2, and in Period 3 “the world ends”. I made a point of having him say to the audience that his approach did not represent econophysics but was in fact the then latest trend in neoclassical economics (which they call “overlapping generations models”).
He hasn’t a clue about how to model a true dynamic process.
June 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am
Steve,
Oh well, thanks for looking. I have suspected that Krugman probably wouldn’t understand or know what to do with your models, and your comments on the approach he cites seem to confirm this. But I had thought it was at least worth a try for him to understand your work given his influence.
Speaking of your models… I have been wondering whether they give insight on the rate at which propensity to default (versus pay down debt) grows as a function of the size of the debt bubble.
In other words, do you see private debt repayment and stagnation (like Japan) or cascading bankruptcies (like the Great Depression) as more probable as the dominant factor in how this global debt bubble unwinds?
I realize policy response likely affects the private debt’s default/repayment mix, but I would guess there might be limits to how much it can push the ratio in the direction of repayment versus default.
June 16th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
The ‘forecast’ GDP for the state of New South Wales has just been released. A year of -0.25%, then -0.5% and then growth of +2.25% in 2010-11!
When the real numbers come in for the triennium at -10% (or worse) there will be complete carnage. These economic forecasts are purely magical thinking.
The only good thing to come out of all of this will be increasing calls to abolish states altogether in Australia.
June 16th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
Steve
This “overlapping generations models” concept you mentioned just shows how hopeless this neoclassical theory is at attempting to understand the effect of time. They are PATHETIC.
This gaping flaw in their theories must be exposed.
The problem is that with the reduction on the emphasis on mathematics in the education system fewer and fewer people learn sufficient mathematics to even understand the significant of your claims. Very few are aware of the immense importance of this. When I make comments on dynamic systems on this blog even other contributors think I am simply suggesting an alternate method of control and it can be taklen or left according to ones philosophy, Marxist, Austrian, Keynsian, etc.
We know it is much more that, it is the only way in which the effect of time and feedback can be considered, timed and quantified. Time and feedback which is inevitable. The neo classicals resort to some type of incestuous genealogical explanation because they are mathematically ignorant and unaware and they are only capable of warm and fuzzy thinking.
The current epistomological problem has its roots in the downgrading of the signicance of mathematics in the education system.
June 16th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
This is a bit outdated and may have been mentioned here before, but in case not, the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics (in Ontario, created by the founders of Research in Motion, which makes the Blackberry) had a conference back in May entitled, “The Economic Crisis and its Implications for The Science of Economics”
…where they invited smart folks from a variety of disciplines to ’start over’ on economics from a more realistic point of view.
This blog post has more details on what went down, seems like the sort of thing Steve might find interesting.
June 16th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
BrightSpark1,
I don’t think that the problem lies in the downgrading of maths in education. The problem with economic and finance models, regardless of economic ideology, is that maths is being used to play games with these models that have no connection to reality.
Political economists have and will continue to denounce the use of maths in economics, but as Steve has pointed out, the problem is not maths but the way it is used to build and justify a rotting edifice of economic theory and policy.
The economic historian and historian of economic thought, Mark Blaug, put it well:
“Modern economics is “sick.” Economics has increasingly become an intellectual game played for its own sake and not for its practical consequences. Economists have gradually converted the subject into a sort of social mathematics in which analytical rigor as understood in math departments is everything and empirical relevance (as understood in physics departments) is nothing. If a topic cannot be tackled by formal modeling, it is simply consigned to the intellectual underworld.” (pp. 12-13)
Blaug, Mark. 1998. “Disturbing Currents in Modern Economics”, Challenge, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 11-34
The econophysicist Joseph McCauley states:
“The future economics theory/econophysics texts will be ?lled with histograms, time series, and with graphs with big error bars, all representing real markets. They will look more like nuclear physics data (few data points, big error bars) than like the smooth curves in the existing economics texts. The aim will be to try to understand how markets work, not to present an irrelevant model about how a real market ideally should (but cannot) behave.” (p. 607)
McCauley, Joseph L. 2006. “Response to ‘Worrying Trends in Econophysics’”, Physica A, Vol. 371, No. 2, pp. 601-609
I agree with you about your comment on dynamic systems. One of the major problems with economics is that certain schools of thought utilize pre-scientific a priori deductive reasoning (neoclassical, Austrian) while others using a mixture of a priori and empirical evidence (post-Keynesians). It would make sense to dump these schools of thought (others as well) and utilize inductive, fact-gathering, empirical methodologies alongside systems analysis, dynamic modeling, engineering, physics, etc.
As for the decline of maths, students being taught six years of linear, cubic, and quadratic equations in high school will not exactly prepare them for the real world. Maths is important, and in subjects like economics, it should be utilized correctly.
June 16th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Declan,
Do RIM want to apply for patents on economic models and then sue?
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/11/09/rim_sues_lg/
Otherwise I don’t see how this can fit into their business model.
June 16th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
I thought this was notable – first time I’ve seen it in the Australian Financial Review.
Introductory economics is wrong on the money multiplier…
In “No need to fear rates this time”, Stephen Grenville AFR 15 June 2009 writes:
“One source of confusion is that some market participants still remember their introductory economics course – the one that explained monetary policy in terms of changes in base money and the credit multiplier.
“They note that central banks increased base money to support weak credit markets. Market commentary talks of ‘printing money’, and inflation seems the inevitable result.
“But this is wrong. Monetary policy no longer works through altering base money and the credit multiplier but by setting the short-term interest rate, with base money being demand-determined.
“When the banks feel their precautionary extra base money holding is no longer needed, the central bank will take it back from them in an open market operation.”
June 16th, 2009 at 11:23 pm
I loved this video… I love how the guy actually knows his subject matter very well, despite the language and accent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61bt0hXAbxA&feature=related
Try to stick through to the last couple of minutes if you can as it heats up. It’s kind of how I feel reading the Australian press!
(Warning — reasonably offensive content.)
June 17th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Evan
that guy was a crack up.
Youtube is great.
I hardly watch tv anymore – it is full of cooking shows and people being voted off or rejected for doing something.
Prime time culture of rejection…..
June 17th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
On a more sober note, here is the latest video on why the luminaries of establishment economics “did not see it coming”:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june09/economists_01-09.html
Certainly, I think the irrationality of “animal spirits” explanation is a pathetic cop-out. I prefer the explanation of the intellectual corruption of mainstream economics, which prevented alternative views to be seriously considered. This must change and we will make it happen; Steve and the “real world economics” are a good start.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Don’t tell me the bears have gone in to hiding? I am one myself btw.
It seems we’re out of the ‘Armageddon’ phase, for now at least, with enormous bull runs on equity markets and consumer confidence up. This raises a few questions.
1.Does the rate of private sector and consumer deleveraging have to be of the same magnitude as the previous rate of ‘leveraging’? Could deleveraging last 15 years and not happen with a bang, like many of us here may have thought?
2.And is there a ‘healthy’ debt to GDP ratio? It’s been suggested that we were underleveraged between 1940 and 1980.
3. Could the unpredected global simultaneous packages be mitigating private sector leveraging because they are so ‘quick’? And are we seeing inflation as a consequence of money printing for the same reason?
I personally don’t individuals and corporations will retire debt at a greater rate if they have more money in their pocket. This seems to be the Austrians’ inflationary viewpoint, although it’s impossible to hear that articulated amongst ‘Bernanke is a money printing crook!!!!’ hyperbole.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
We can sleep well and relax, nobody is going to short US Treasuries tonight.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/06/20096162235983899.html
‘And Medvedev’s chief economic aide, Arkady Dvorkovich, emphasised that Moscow did not want to see a sudden plunge in the dollar’s value.
“There is an understanding that the last thing we need now is turmoil on financial markets,” Dvorkovich said. “No one wants to ruin the dollar, including us.”‘
June 17th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
But the US$ time as the world currency may be drawing to an end:
“Arkady Dvorkovich said Russia could consider investing its reserves not only in the United States and European countries but also in the financial instruments traded by BRIC states”
http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,27753,25649483-31037,00.html
June 17th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Has anyone out there heard Roubini? “recovery in 6 months…”??I s this guy desperate for a job?? or is he ’spruiking’ for someone I don’t know about??
June 17th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Ho tommy,
Roubini really confuses me. At one moment he talks down the green shoots recovery and says the banks are insolvent and their books are fudged. He says the US housing market has another 20% to fall and that the US cannot be reverted back to their consuming glory. At the same time he talks about a recovery in 2010 but it will be slow and shadowed that it will technically feel like a recession??
Peter Schiff is bang on and not yet changed. Dont know about his hyper inflation expectations. Also about China/India or Asia denominating from now on?. I can say India is on track with his predictions cannot say much about china.
June 17th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Thanks Joshua, yes spot on!! cannot work him out! I think I will stick with a ‘certain’ Professor Keen!! still on track and does not waiver!!
June 17th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Joshua
After reading your earlier post about India I did some checking. I lived and worked there for 3 years (mid 04 to mid 07). I ran a large back office processing centre for a UK outsouring company (financial accounting, insurance administration, transaction processing, that sort of thing, some IT outsourcing but only minor call centre work).
Back then India was experiencing one of the biggest employment booms in history. Attrition rates were unbelievable — for example, I interviewed two separate guys at other companies who were experiencing annual rates of 250%. This was unusally high but in the call centre side of the outsourcing industry 100% was about average (versus the reported 40%). Every business was fighting for staff and this only intensified when the domestic economy started to boom in mid 06. I used to ask my UK colleagues all the time: “how would your management style change if you knew that every single one of your subordinates had 5 bonafide job offers in his/her bottom drawer?”
From what I hear it has drastically changed since the crash last year. It may be picking up slightly now but it certainly isn’t “booming”. Here’s what an old colleague of mine sent me today:
“What I know is that there are still jobs available, but not like in 2006, and certainly not for middle managers (or senior managers!). Our attrition is down to 16% (including voice) which is crazy, we don’t have enough people leaving!
I still get about one call a month for some HR position in different companies, but in 2006, I used to get a few calls every week! So, it’s definitely not the same.”
It’s very common for western business people to return from India after short trips with huge expectations for the country, usually following interactions with slick Indian execs and wide-eyed and over-educated junior employees. The reality on the ground can be very different. While I think the Indian IT/ITES industry will still remain in pretty good shape going forward I still think there is a lot of potential downside. All those IT projects in the boom times required a lot of up-front capex and were based on bullish forward projections. With the western financial sector in serious decline and discretionary investment across all western economies under extreme pressure, I can’t see them continuing along their previous trajectory. After all, the dot com bust almost wiped many of them out. A lot of clueless western execs may accelerate offshoring to reduce overheads but I think customers these days are a little wiser than they were a few years ago. Offshoring comes with huge management issues and rarely achieves forecast savings, despite the headline cost-per-FTE comparisons. Buyer beware.
June 17th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
ak said, in June 17th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
We can sleep well and relax, nobody is going to short US Treasuries tonight.
Not sure I believe that entirely. Yes sure just about all nation states have their hands tied in a Mexican standoff. But it only takes one (or a Mr Buffet type) to make a move and they could potentially make a killing. History has shown that there are always people prepared to make money at the expense of others.
Two Japanese caught with $135Billion!! Could the Japense be making the 1st move? Will it cause someone else to make a move?
June 17th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Zulu,
I can print $135bln of bonds on my home printer as well. Maybe it was an UFO what dropped them?
This plan is more plausible:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KF17Dj03.html
The Chinese still want to have a trade surplus even if they are to credit the buyers but they would like in the end to be paid for their goods – hardly surprising by the way.
Trigerring a currency crisis now wouldn’t help any big player. In fact the longer the US can play their current game the more they are screwed up in the future. I still believe that the US could recover in a few years time if they were confronted with the reality now. This is what happened in Argentina. But if they sink deeper and deeper into stimulating the consumer demand and debt they will one day reach a point of no return when all the productive economy apart from making useless military gear is gone. Some of big players would like to see this scenario. Then they can turn off the tap as it happened in the Ukraine and see whether the Americans really have the balls.
This is interesting (see the graphs):
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm
Of course there can be something unexpected what triggers the meltdown prematurely.
June 17th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
I found this interesting.
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2009/06/definancialisation-deglobalisation.html
June 17th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Hello All,
Since this appears to be the place to comment on the current financial news, I’d like to ask for your thoughts.
The state government has stated that it will be buing local. Is this “Protectionist” policy bad?
I currently work in the NSW Rail industry, a current contract (signed a couple of years ago)requires delivery of 600+ carriages over the next 3 years. This is imposible with the infrastructure we have in Australia. The job had to be almost completely outsourced to China to meet this delivery schedule. So there has been a significant change of policy in this regard.
Despite China’s fixed currency, cost to source from China is actually high. To save costs, there are in fact some components being made in Australia, shipped to China for assembly into the trains.
Why is Chinese policy to keep exports cheap OK, but Australian policy to make our industry competetive bad?
I have read that “protectionism” worsened the Great Depresion. Steve, do you agree with this notion? Why did it do so?
Sorry for such a long fist post and thank you for the very interesting reading to date.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
From an article that should be interesting to those here