My submission to the 2020 Summit

Flattr this!

Sec­tion One on ” The future of the Aus­tralian econ­o­my” starts with the fol­low­ing pre­am­ble:

The Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ment is com­mit­ted to mod­ernising our econ­o­my so that we can com­pete with the lead­ing nations in a world econ­o­my that is being trans­formed by glob­al­i­sa­tion, new tech­nolo­gies, and the rise of Chi­na and India. While we take full advan­tage of the min­ing boom, we must also build long term com­pet­i­tive strengths in the glob­al indus­tries of tomor­row — indus­tries that will pro­vide the high-pay­ing jobs of the future.

The Aus­tralia 2020 Sum­mit will exam­ine:

  • After a long peri­od of sus­tained eco­nom­ic growth and with the added ben­e­fits of the glob­al min­ing boom, how do we best invest the pro­ceeds of this pros­per­i­ty to lay the foun­da­tions for future eco­nom­ic growth?
  • How we best pre­pare for a glob­al econ­o­my that will increas­ing­ly be based upon advanced skills, advanced tech­nol­o­gy, low car­bon ener­gy sources and inte­gra­tion with glob­al sup­ply chains?
  • How we take advan­tage of Australia’s prox­im­i­ty to the fast grow­ing economies in the world?
  • How we boost pub­lic and pri­vate invest­ment in eco­nom­ic infra­struc­ture?
  • Fos­ter inno­va­tion in the work­place; encour­ag­ing the trans­fer of ideas across busi­ness­es and economies? ”

My sub­mis­sion

I add a 6th point: “Cope with a finan­cial­ly frag­ile eco­nom­ic sys­tem”.Fragili­ty is indi­cat­ed by the pro­por­tion of GDP need­ed to ser­vice debt; the high­er this pro­por­tion is, the less there is avail­able to both con­sume and invest. Econ­o­mists habit­u­al­ly excuse any pri­vate bor­row­ing on the assump­tion that it will lead to increased out­put, and thus finance itself. But 90% of the debt incurred in the past 3 decades has financed spec­u­la­tion rather than invest­ment. Pro­duc­tive capac­i­ty has risen far less than debt, so that the debt ratio has grown expo­nen­tial­ly.

All major OECD nations (except France) have expe­ri­enced ris­ing pri­vate debt to GDP ratios over the past 3 decades. Australia’s debt ratio rose 4.2% faster than GDP for the past 44 years—taking our ratio from 24% in 1964 (and 43% in 1977) to 165% now. The UK’s pri­vate non-finan­cial debt ratio was 96% in 1977, ver­sus 243% now; the USA’s was 93% exclud­ing finance, and 108% includ­ing, in 1977; today it is 170% exclud­ing finance, and 282% includ­ing.

These lev­els are unprece­dent­ed. The US pri­vate non-finan­cial debt to GDP ratio was 150% in 1929—20% below today’s lev­el (it peaked at 215% in 1932, due to Great Depres­sion defla­tion of 10% p.a., and falling out­put of 13% p.a.).

Low­er inter­est rates do not explain this growth in debt: inter­est rates were low­er in the 1970s than they are now, when the debt ratio was 1/6th of what it is today.

The debt has caused a lever­aged increase in asset prices, which are also at unprece­dent­ed lev­els when com­pared with con­sumer prices. Though US asset prices have begun falling recent­ly, if any­thing resem­bling rever­sion to the mean occurs, they have a lot fur­ther to go. Shiller’s “Irra­tional Exu­ber­ance” indices show US house prices rose from 115 in 1997 to 228 in mid-2006 (ver­sus the 1890–1995 aver­age of 103), before falling to 190 now. His real Dow Jones index peaked at 1240 last year, against the 1915–1995 aver­age of 255.

Aus­tralia is no bet­ter placed. Nigel Stapledon’s long term price index implies Aus­tralian house prices are even more over­val­ued than the USA’s.

Recov­er­ies from oth­er finan­cial crises in the post-WWII peri­od have worked because they have re-ignit­ed the growth in pri­vate bor­row­ing. I doubt that there is any fur­ther capac­i­ty to do this: there are no sub-sub­prime bor­row­ers to whom to lend. The growth in debt lev­els and asset prices will reverse, and the change in pri­vate debt will there­fore sub­tract from demand rather than aug­ment­ing it.

This prospec­tive defla­tion­ary sce­nario revers­es accept­ed wis­dom on eco­nom­ic pol­i­cy. Sus­tain­ing bud­get sur­plus­es and sup­press­ing com­mod­i­ty price infla­tion in this envi­ron­ment would wors­en the out­come, by reduc­ing the capac­i­ty of pri­vate bor­row­ers to reduce their debt, and by main­tain­ing the real bur­den of debt.

Graphs and web links to sub­stan­ti­ate the above are avail­able at my Deb­watch Blog: www.debtdeflation.com/blogs.

Bookmark the permalink.

About Steve Keen

I am Professor of Economics and Head of Economics, History and Politics at Kingston University London, and a long time critic of conventional economic thought. As well as attacking mainstream thought in Debunking Economics, I am also developing an alternative dynamic approach to economic modelling. The key issue I am tackling here is the prospect for a debt-deflation on the back of the enormous private debts accumulated globally, and our very low rate of inflation.